RQ Client Prevails on Summary Judgment

Katherine Brim successfully argued the statute of repose barred all claims brought by Lennar builders against their client, a subcontractor on a Northern Colorado residential project. The client’s work was completed in 2005. Notwithstanding the Colorado Construction Defect Action Reform Act’s (CDARA) requires that suit generally be instituted no later than six years after substantial completion of the improvement. Suit was not filed until 2012. RQ sought summary judgment, arguing the most equitable application of the statute of repose required claims be brought no later than six years after the completion of each building the client worked on – not within six years of the completion of the entire project. The Court agreed, dismissing all claims asserted against RQ’s client. For more information about CDARA, the statute of repose, or to obtain a copy of the Order, please contact Katy Brim.

Published by
Jeffrey Ruebel

Recent Posts

Meet the RQ Law Team: Local Experience, Statewide Reach

At RQ Law, we’re proud to combine personal, small firm service with results that rival…

1 month ago

Colorado’s New Laws—Effective Summer & Fall 2025

When Did They Kick In?  Most laws passed during Colorado’s regular 2025 legislative session took…

2 months ago

Why Small Firms Win Big: The Advantages of a Boutique Defense Practice

At RQ Law, formerly Ruebel & Quillen, our boutique approach isn't just a label—it’s our greatest…

3 months ago

COLORADO SELECT CASE LAW UPDATE

Colorado Supreme Court City & County of Denver v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Adams…

2 years ago

COLORADO SELECT CASE LAW UPDATE

Federal Rules of Evidence Though not case law, we find it important to note three…

2 years ago

COLORADO SELECT CASE LAW UPDATE

Colorado Court of Appeals Rosten v. ICAO—Court holds failure to conduct in-person examination does not…

2 years ago